Gabungan Pilihanraya Bersih dan Adil / Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections

BERSIH Calls for Royal Commission on Electoral Reform after the General Election

February 15th, 2008 | Posted in Press Release | | Print This Post Print This Post

Memorandum to His Majesty Yang di-Pertuan Agong

15 February 2008The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (BERSIH) has no confidence in that the upcoming General Election will be clean, free and fair.

BERSIH is initiating a nationwide signature campaign during the General Election to back a memorandum to DYMM Yang DiPertuan Agong for the establishment of a Royal Commission on Electoral Reform (RCER) after the elections.

BERSIH also urges voters to:
1. Come out to vote to prevent phantoms from voting on their behalf;
2. Sign the petition for the Royal Commission on Electoral Reform (RCER);
3. Record and document incidence of fraud, irregularities and misconduct so that they can be submitted to the RCER after elections;
4. Vote for parties that uphold the electoral reform agenda.


Why This General Election Will Not Be Clean, Free and Fair

BERSIH has presented five pressing demands to the Election Commission to ensure that the elections will meet the basic international standard for democratic elections, not withstanding greater problems in administrative neutrality, election finances, electoral administration and electoral system.

Unfortunately, none of the five minimal demands have been met, making the upcoming elections on 8 March 2008 just a ritual to legitimize the perpetuation of Barisan Nasional’s rule, rather than a level playing field for the people of Malaysia to choose their government and public office holders.

1. Electoral Roll

The electoral roll remains contaminated even after the deletion of 500,000 names of deceased voters. Documented cases of the following problems point to four key areas yet to be resolved:

(a) massive transfer of voters to other constituencies, which is effectively gerrymandering without re-districting (eg. Ipoh Timor, Perak and Belantek, Kedah where thousands of postal voters have been ‘conveniently’ moved into Opposition-held constituencies);

(b) fraudulent registrations by ‘impersonators’ (eg. Sharmila Thuraisingam from Subang has never registered to vote but recently discovered she is a voter in Kelantan);

(c) fraudulent registrations using non-existent addresses;

(d) arbitrary assignment of family members living at the same address to different constituencies (eg. the Ong family in Segamat has eight voters living at the same registered address of 278-D, Kg Abdullah, 85000 Segamat, but are split up to vote at two different constituencies: Sekijang and Segamat).

By altering the electoral roll for Belantek, Kedah, AFTER the end of the objection period, the Election Commission is violating the Elections (Registration of Elector) Regulations 2002 and committing an offence under Section 4 of the Election Offences Act 1954. This is particularly problematic and alarming. It shows that despite heavy criticism from the public, the EC is both arrogant and has no qualms about flouting the law openly.

2. Indelible Ink

Indelible ink can prevent multiple voting, effectively disposing of the phantom voter problem. However, effective employment of indelible ink however requires the amendment of the Elections (Conduct of Elections) Regulations 1981, which by law needs to be laid before the Dewan Rakyat for approval.

Although the National Fatwa Council had consented to its use in early August 2007, the Election Commission deliberately failed to present the amendment to Parliament in its last session which lasted from late-August to December 2007. It also did not advise the Prime Minister against requesting for parliamentary dissolution before such an amendment is made.

As it stands now, the employment of indelible ink has no legal basis and any voter can refuse to be marked, just by signing the so-called Form 10A, which in itself is an unlawful creation of the Election Commission. This throws open the door for all phantom voters to opt out from this crucial exercise while giving the Election Commission a golden opportunity to falsely claim that the election is free from multiple voting.

3. Postal Voting

Postal voting for the armed forces and police personnel have always been marred by intimidation, breach of secrecy and outright proxy voting. This has made postal voters a convenient ‘wild card’ to ‘rescue’ BN in marginal constituencies. As the laws do not explicitly stipulate the geographical link of postal voters to a constituency, this tactic has been conveniently used by the EC to transfer postal voters to assist BN in certain areas, as and when it sees fit.

BERSIH’s call to abolish domestic postal voting for this very reason has been completely ignored. There has not been any single amendment to the Elections (Postal Voting) Regulations 2003 to address either the consent on polling and electoral roll irregularities.

4. Free and Fair Media Access

Free and fair access to media for all parties and candidates, as a requisite for a level playing field, is a necessary condition for clean, free and fair elections. Without balanced reporting and the free flow of information, voters cannot make informed choices. Under Malaysian restrictive media laws, all mainstream media avenues are effectively controlled by BN, with UMNO owning all private free-to-view television channels.

While the election laws do not cover media operations, the EC has every right and the power to push for amendments in the Election Offences Act 1954 to criminalize the deliberate use of malicious and biased reporting as a form of undue influence.

BERSIH has been calling for the EC to encourage televised election debates and allocate fair airtime for all contesting parties RTM but all our pleas have fallen on deaf ears.

5. 21-day Campaign Period

BERSIH has also called for a 21-day campaign period, which is half of what Malayan voters enjoyed in 1955 when the country was ruled by the British. An adequately sufficient campaign period allows voters to get different views and relevant information, especially on new candidates from both the ruling and opposition parties.

This request has also been turned down by the EC, which has given a paltry 13-day campaign period for the upcoming election.
WHY A ROYAL COMMISSION ON ELECTORAL REFORM IS NECESSARY

Given the presence of blatant fraudulent practices and the absence of a level playing field, BERSIH appeals to DYMM Yang DiPertuan Agong to appoint a Royal Commission on Electoral Reform (RCER) immediately after the elections. Under the Commissions of Enquiry Act 1950 (Revised 1973), His Majesty the King may, where it appears to him to be expedient so to do, issue a Commission appointing one or more Commissioners and authorizing the Commissioners to enquire into -
• the conduct of any federal officer;
• the conduct or management of any department of the public service of Malaysia;
• the conduct or management of any public institution which is not solely maintained by State funds; or
• any other matter in which an enquiry would, in the opinion of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, be for the public welfare (other than a matter involving any question relating to the Islamic religion or the Malay custom and/or inquiries for state purposes where Sabah or Sarawak are concerned).

The RCER’s terms of reference should cover:
(a) matters of cleanness, freeness and fairness in the entire electoral process, including the electoral roll and polling, campaigning, electoral administration and electoral system;
(b) fact-finding and investigation into any allegations of election fraud, irregularities and misconduct in the 12th General Elections.

BERSIH hereby launches a nationwide signature campaign for the RCER. We appeal to all parties and candidates to support the campaign. We also appeal to all voters to record and document any instances of election fraud, irregularities and misconduct – such as phantom voters, impersonation, multiple voting, vote-buying, intimidation, breach of secrecy – in words or audio-visual form ready to be submitted to the RCER.

BERSIH has full confidence that the King will stand for and stand by democracy in Malaysia, as per his role and responsibility entrusted by the Federal Constitution.

9 Responses to “BERSIH Calls for Royal Commission on Electoral Reform after the General Election”

  1. Sharing Says:

    Scratching the Itch and not the Pain!
    ——————————————-
    Shouldn’t EC Chief and all unfairness be taken to court?
    Or, even to UK if Malaysia still a member of the Commonwealth?

    Show voters Malaysia is under Law!

  2. Richy Says:

    True, I mentioned this earlier and I am with sharing. Being a body responsible for fair and just election, EC must not be seen neglecting any evidents that may suggest existence of discrepancies. And if EC continues to neglect it would only prove its’ failure which would be the basis for action on the part of Bersih. In such case wouldn’t court action be most appropriate?

  3. Sharing Says:

    With the existing judiciary system, most probably the Court will be messy and working also Bias.
    If all possible legal procedures been done but court failed to address!
    This will prove Court & EC are no more than a Joke!
    With the restriction of GE within 60 days after dissolved, the court cannot delay.
    The GE could be delayed after April for Anwar to come in.
    Or until 2009 when there will be more time to sort out the EC!

    500,000 Deceased Voters Deleted!!
    ———————————————
    Subpoena EC for the List!
    Subpoena EC for the list of Participants in 2004!
    Subpoena IC Department for the dates of the Death of those 500,000.
    Then how many had been phantom Voters will automatically be shown!
    The figure are more than the total of the differences of the winning Candidates over the loosing ones!!

  4. Bersih’s Memorandum Delivery « Ak57’s Weblog Says:

    [...] went to the palace on 16th February 2008 to hand over a memorandum/protest note (link) to the King, and as expected some token arrests were made. What bothers me is how well everything [...]

  5. yapchongyee Says:

    Khairy Jamaluddin DO NOT BULLSHIT, here is a real case for you and if you are a real OXFORD UNIVERSITY GRADUATE then you will know that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali needs to be prosecuted for committing criminal offences.

    I refer readers to my post on this fellow Khairy Jamaluddin, son in law of the Prime Minister and play-boy with a fleet of very expensive cars, please go to http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com.

    Dear Khairy Jamaluddin is all hot air, lots of empty talk before election and nothing but promises after the election. He has been put into the deputy leadership of UMNO Youth. Where else can his father in law “fast track” him into the front ranks of UMNO and eventually to succeed Ahmad Bedawi as Prime Minister ? I have observed many times that Malaysia is an oligarchy in the IRON GRIP of UMNO elite. The promises he has made so far can only exist in his mind alone and in fact cannot be realized. They are mere empty promises and are not to be taken seriously.

    Ket me draw this Khairy Jamaluddin’s attention to the ongoing ROYAL COMMISSION INTO JUDICIAL CORRUPTION ! What is Khairy Jamaluddin going to do to ADDRESS JUDICIAL CORRUPTION ? This is what solid and down to earth ISSUES that need to be addressed; and has he said anything about it ? Let me cite my wife’s CASE : ORIGINATING PETITION No.: D2-26-41 of 2001 in the HIGH COURT IN KL was struck out by the PRESIDING JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI, who is now promoted to the court of Appeal. It is hilariously funny that judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali was so IGNORANT OF THE LAW THAT SHE AWARDED TO THE RESPONDENTS WONG KEM CHEN, STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN AND KWONG SEA YOON 2 directly OPPOSING ORDERS (a) for security for costs, which my wife paid in the sum of RM.60,000; therefore by this payment by my wife there is nothing else to be done except to go to court; but instead judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali went on to ILLEGALLY AWARD TO THE NAMED RESPONDENTS A SECOND AND OPPOSING ORDER TO STRIKE OUT PETITION.

    The ignorance of this judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is so comically profound THAT ALL HER ACTIONS ON THE BENCH IN HER ADJUDICATION OF MY WIFE’S PETITION WERE CRIMINAL. She committed the following criminal OFFENCES :

    (1) Aiding & Abetting respondents Wong Kem Chen, Stephen Lim and Kwong Sea Yoon TO COMMIT the criminal offences of PERJURY & FORGERY
    (2) Acting jointly with above criminal respondents in A CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE
    (3) Acting jointly in a conspiracy to obtain money under false pretences
    (4) Acting jointly in a conspiracy to obstruct police investigating criminal offences
    (5) Committed the criminal offences of Malfeasance.

    I had written countless letters to the Malaysian A.-G, Chief Judge of High Court of Malaya, copies to President & Secretary of Malaysian Bar Council and to this day I have not received any response. Here is a Judge of the Highest Court of Malaysia who does not KNOW THAT SHE WAS IN FACT COMMITTING SEVERAL CRIMINAL OFFENCES WHILE PERFORMING HER JUDICIAL DUTIES. I have invited the Malaysian A,G, and all those mentioned above to come to Australia to obtain my EXTRADITION FOR SEDITION so why have they failed to clear the name of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali ? Why bother for the Malaysian Government to spend several millions of Ringgit to hold a bullshit Royal commission when criminal behaviour of Judge Zainon Binti Mohd. Ali is all there to READY FOR PROSECUTION.

    What is this fellow Khairy Jamaluddin going to do about a REAL CASE and not one that is hot air. I invite the Malaysian Government to come to Australia to get my EXTRADITION.

  6. BERSIH warns that GE2008 may be the dirtiest election ever in Malaysian history - BERSIH Says:

    [...] posts: BERSIH calls for Royal Commission on Electoral Reform after the General Election « PM: EC’S Reversal Of Indelible Ink Decision To Prevent Voter Victimisation 16 [...]

  7. Sean E Says:

    If you want to have a better future for our children in Malaysia, do your part by signing the on-line petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/RCER2008/petition.html

    This is one of the way (non-violence) to bring our message to the Government. Don’t just sit there, stand up and be counted!

    Why do we need to reform the Election Commission?

    1) Gerrymandering. The discrepancy between number of voters in voting areas is too great. The smallest parliamentary seat (Federal Territory, Putrajaya) has only 6,608 voters while the parliamentary seat for Kapar in Selangor has 112,224 voters. What this means is that one vote in the Putrajaya parliamentary constituency is equivalent to 17 votes in the Kapar constituency.

    2) Phantom voters. A common tactic is to ‘buy’ the identity card of the voters. Party members from the ruling parties will then vote on the voters’ behalf. Random checking of a person’s identity must be conducted using those finger print checking device (like the bank use). Any voting done on another person’s identity must be made a serious offence under the election law.

    3) Postal votes. The rules on postal voting must be reviewed, tightened and amended. The current rule favours the ruling party as the armed forces personnel and policemen who vote by ‘postal voting’ would obviously not jeopardize their career or promotion prospect by voting for the opposition. Voting under postal voting is not secret as it is under the watchful eyes of the senior officers.

    4) Spoiled votes. How do we define spoiled votes. It is very easy to turn good votes into spoiled votes (by adding one more x to the ballot paper). Are spoiled votes being verified and watched over by the party representatives? In marginal areas in which the winning margin is razor thin, the so-called spoiled votes need to be scrutinized.

  8. a ghani b salleh Says:

    kita pelawa 40 ahli perlimen BN, dgn tawaran menteri & timbalan menteri supaya menyertai pembangkang dan BN akan bubar dan kita pula yg merintah …..Isya’Allah

  9. a ghani b salleh Says:

    KULI lawan Pok Loh
    KULI lawan Najib
    kita doa agar BN Terus terus musnah

Leave a Reply